Active Class Action · Intake Open
Reviewing Claims: Chevron El Segundo Refinery Explosion
Trujillo & Winnick LLP represents plaintiff Daniel Coffey in an active putative class action concerning alleged property damage, exposure concerns, and other claimed impacts following the October 2, 2025 Chevron El Segundo Refinery explosion.
Allegations only. No class has been certified. No court has determined liability or damages.
Case Snapshot
- Case
- Coffey v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., et al.
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Central District of California
- Case No.
- 2:25-cv-09699
- Complaint Filed
- October 10, 2025
- Litigation Status
- Active / Pending
- Class Status
- No class has been certified
- Source Document
- 📄 Class Action Complaint, Doc. 1 — filed October 10, 2025 ↗
What the Complaint Alleges
The following summarizes allegations contained in the filed Class Action Complaint, Doc. 1 (Case No. 2:25-cv-09699). These are allegations only — no court has determined liability, and Chevron U.S.A. Inc. has not been adjudged responsible for any harm.
The Incident Alleged
The complaint alleges that on October 2, 2025, an explosion and fire occurred at the Chevron El Segundo Refinery, releasing soot, ash, smoke, fumes, and oily residue into surrounding South Bay communities.
Alleged Property Impacts
The complaint alleges that vehicles, homes, boats, and other property owned or occupied by putative class members were contaminated or damaged by residue from the alleged release.
Alleged Health & Exposure Concerns
The complaint alleges that putative class members were exposed to airborne contaminants and experienced respiratory and other health-related concerns arising from the alleged release. No medical determination has been made.
Legal Claims Asserted
The complaint asserts claims for negligence, strict liability, nuisance, trespass, negligence per se, medical monitoring, and restitution / unjust enrichment. All claims are allegations and have not been adjudicated.
Source: Class Action Complaint, Doc. 1, Coffey v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-09699 (C.D. Cal., filed Oct. 10, 2025). All matters above are allegations only.
Categories of Alleged Harm
The following are categories of harm alleged in the complaint. Not all categories may apply to every putative class member.
Property Contamination
The complaint alleges soot, ash, and oily residue deposited on properties in the vicinity of the refinery. Cleanup and remediation costs are claimed.
Smoke & Fume Exposure
Plaintiff alleges that smoke and airborne fumes from the refinery incident affected nearby residents. Exposure allegations are contained in the complaint.
Cleanup Costs
The complaint alleges that class members incurred or may incur costs to clean and remediate property allegedly contaminated by the incident.
Loss of Use & Enjoyment
Putative class members may have alleged an inability to use and enjoy their properties as a result of contamination or disturbance described in the complaint.
Medical Monitoring
The complaint includes a medical monitoring claim on behalf of putative class members allegedly exposed to contaminants. No diagnosis or injury has been established by any court finding.
Property Value Impacts
The complaint alleges harm to the value, use, and marketability of residential and commercial properties in the vicinity of the Chevron El Segundo refinery.
All categories above reflect allegations in the complaint only. No class has been certified. No court has determined liability or damages.
Who May Want to Contact the Firm
Individuals who lived, worked, owned property, or had property in areas they believe were affected by the October 2, 2025 Chevron El Segundo Refinery explosion may contact the firm for a confidential case evaluation.
Contacting the firm does not guarantee representation or any particular outcome. Each inquiry is reviewed on its own facts. Whether to proceed requires an agreement between the individual and the firm.
Areas that may have been affected include communities in and around El Segundo, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach, and neighboring South Bay communities, based on the allegations in the complaint. This is not a definitive list of eligible areas.
Court Documents
Class Action Complaint, Doc. 1 — filed October 10, 2025
Coffey v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-09699, U.S. District Court, Central District of California
This is a pleading containing allegations. No class has been certified, and no court has determined liability or damages.
What Happens Next
Submitting information does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation begins only after a written agreement is signed.
Step 1
Submit Your Information
Visit chevronrefinerycase.com or call (310) 210-9302. Provide a brief description of your situation and the location of your property or residence.
Step 2
Initial Follow-Up
A member of our team may contact you to discuss your experience, alleged impacts, and any documentation you may have. All communications are kept confidential.
Step 3
Written Agreement
If we agree to proceed, representation begins only after a written engagement agreement is signed by both the client and the firm. No representation is implied before that point.
Ready to Submit Your Information?
Intake for this matter is handled through the dedicated case intake site.
There is no charge for an evaluation. Submitting information does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Start Chevron Refinery Intake →or call (310) 210-9302
For general firm inquiries unrelated to the Chevron refinery matter, use the firm contact page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who may qualify to join this case?
Individuals who allege property damage, exposure concerns, or other impacts from the October 2, 2025 Chevron El Segundo Refinery explosion may contact the firm for a confidential evaluation. No eligibility determination is made until a case is reviewed.
Is there a deadline to contact the firm?
Statutes of limitations vary based on the nature and timing of alleged harm. Do not delay — contact us promptly so your situation can be evaluated.
What does it cost to contact the firm?
There is no charge for an initial case evaluation. The firm handles these matters on a contingency fee basis — attorney fees are payable only from a recovery, if any is obtained.
Does contacting the firm create an attorney-client relationship?
No. Submitting a form or calling the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation begins only after a written engagement agreement is signed by both parties.
Active Litigation Notice: Coffey v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-09699, is in active litigation in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California. Nothing on this page constitutes a statement of the merits of this action, an admission, or a judicial determination. All matters described are allegations only and have not been adjudicated. No class has been certified and no liability has been determined. Attorney advertising. Responsible attorney: Anthony W. Trujillo, CA Bar No. 248860.